When designing reports in Oracle Cloud EPM Planning using Report Designer, data sources and report objects (e.g., grids, charts) have specific capabilities. The two true statements about data sources in reports are:
* A. Insert charts in the report header to provide a quick visual summary of data: Incorrect. Report Designer does not support inserting charts directly into the report header; charts are added as objects within the report body, linked to data sources.
* B. Include a chart in your report without displaying the underlying data grid: Correct. You can create a chart object tied to a data source (e.g., a grid) and configure it to display only the chart, suppressing the grid for a cleaner visual presentation.
* C. Control the way a report object is printed on the page relative to other report objects: Correct. Report Designer allows you to adjust the layout and positioning of report objects (e.g., grids, charts) relative to each other, controlling how they appear when printed or exported.
* D. Insert a report object into the report if you are in Modify mode: Incorrect. While you modify reports in Report Designer, there’s no specific “Modify mode” restriction-objects can be inserted during initial design or edits, but this is not a data source-specific feature.
The Oracle documentation verifies that B and C reflect Report Designer’s flexibility with data sources and object management, making them the correct answers.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Designing Reports with Report Designer” (docs.
oracle.com, Published 2024-09-30).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Report Designer Data Sources” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-
12-05, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, the Benefits and Taxes Wizard is used to configure employee- related financial components, such as additional earnings, benefits, and taxes, within the Workforce module.
To configure Additional Earnings specifically, members must be imported into theComponentdimension.
This dimension is designed to categorize and manage various types of earnings, benefits, and taxes that apply to employees.
TheComponentdimension acts as a foundational structure in the Workforce module, allowing administrators to define and import members (e.g., “Bonus,” “Overtime,” or other additional earnings types) that can then be associated with employees via the wizard. The wizard uses these members to calculate and allocate costs accurately across the workforce plan.
* B. Account: While the Account dimension is critical for financial reporting and calculations, it is not the dimension where Additional Earnings members are imported in the Benefits and Taxes Wizard.
Accounts are typically used to map earnings to financial statements, not to define the earnings types themselves.
* C. Property: The Property dimension is used for employee or job attributes (e.g., location, department), not for configuring earnings types in the wizard.
* D. Pay Type: Although Pay Type is related to salary and wage classifications, it is not the dimension used for importing Additional Earnings members in the Benefits and Taxes Wizard. Pay Type is more about categorizing base pay structures rather than additional earnings components.
References
* Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: “Administering Workforce – Benefits and Taxes Wizard” (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Specifies that “members for additional earnings must be imported into the Component dimension” for configuration in the wizard.
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Highlights the Component dimension as the target for importing earnings-related members in Workforce configuration.

In Oracle Planning 2024, integrating detailed Workforce data (such as salary, benefits, and taxes) into Financials involves leveraging out-of-the-box integration features like data maps and Smart Push. To override expense lines in Financials with more detailed values stored in Workforce, the correct approach is to define how Workforce accounts roll up into Financials accounts using the “Financial Statement Integration” data map. This process involves mapping specific Workforce accounts (e.g., payroll taxes, total salary) to corresponding Financials accounts and then synchronizing and pushing the data to update Financials with the detailed values.
Option A is the verified answer because it directly addresses the initial setup required to move detailed Workforce values into Financials by defining the rollup mappings in the Financial Statement Integration data map. After this mapping is configured, administrators can synchronize and push the data to reflect the detailed values in Financials reporting. Option B is incorrect because the Financials Integration Summary form is used to view rolled-up data, not to calculate compensation data for updating underlying Workforce details-this is a Workforce-specific task, not a data movement step. Option C is also incorrect, as there is no “Rollup business rule” explicitly mentioned in the Financials Integration Summary form’s Actions menu for this purpose; instead, rollup occurs via data maps. Option D, while related to Compensation Data synchronization, is a narrower action that does not fully address the broader task of moving detailed Workforce values into Financials expense lines, which requires the Financial Statement Integration data map.
The Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation documentation highlights that Financials integrates with Workforce using predefined data maps, such as Financial Statement Integration, to roll up detailedemployee expenses into financial reporting, making Option A the most accurate and complete step for this scenario.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Integration Scenarios and Workflow” (docs.oracle.
com, Published 2024-08-19).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Oracle 1Z0-1080-20 Planning 2020 Implementation Essentials” (updated for 2024 workflows).
* Oracle Planning Documentation: “Administering and Working with Strategic Workforce Planning” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-12-04).

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, Forms 2.0 represents an enhanced version of the form design and functionality framework compared to Forms 1.0. To develop forecasts using Forms 2.0, existing forms must be transitioned from the older version to the newer one, as they are not automatically compatible or universally enabled.
* D. Migrate the forms you want to work with in Forms 2.0 from Forms 1.0 to Forms 2.0: This is the correct statement. Oracle provides a migration process to convert Forms 1.0 forms to Forms 2.0, enabling users to leverage the advanced features of Forms 2.0 (e.g., improved navigation, dynamic rows
/columns, and enhanced usability). This migration is selective, meaning only the forms you choose to use with Forms 2.0 need to be migrated, and it is not a one-time global setup.
* A. Set up Forms 2.0 in your environment one time and it will work with all your applications:
Forms 2.0 is not a one-time environment-wide setup. It requires specific forms to be migrated or designed for Forms 2.0 compatibility, and not all applications automatically adopt it.
* B. Switch between Forms 1.0 and Forms 2.0 by selecting the Forms Version in Application Settings: There is no such toggle in Application Settings to switch between Forms 1.0 and Forms 2.0.
The transition to Forms 2.0 involves migration rather than a simple version switch.
* C. Redesign forms 1.0 forms so that they are set up to work with Forms 2.0: While redesigning is an option for creating new Forms 2.0-compatible forms, the standard process for existing forms is migration, not a complete redesign from scratch. Migration preserves the form structure while adapting it to Forms 2.0.
The migration process ensures that users can take advantage of Forms 2.0’s capabilities while maintaining continuity with existing form designs, aligning with Oracle’s recommended approach.
References
* Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: “Working with Forms – Forms
2.0″ (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). States that “to use Forms 2.0, migrate existing Forms 1.0 forms to Forms 2.0 using the provided migration tools.”
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Confirms that migrating Forms 1.0 to Forms 2.0 is the true setup process for leveraging Forms 2.0 in forecasting.

In Oracle Planning 2024’s Projects module, revenue and expense calculations are driven by specific assumptions that influence project financials. The three types of assumptions that directly drive these calculations are Working days and hours, Standard rates, and Project rates:
* A. Working days and hours: This assumption defines the available time for project execution (e.g., days per week, hours per day), directly impacting labor costs and revenue projections based on resource utilization.
* C. Standard rates: These are predefined rates (e.g., hourly or daily rates for labor or equipment) applied across projects unless overridden, driving cost and revenue calculations consistently.
* E. Project rates: These are project-specific rates that override standard rates when defined, allowing for tailored revenue and expense calculations based on unique project requirements.
* B. Plan start year: This is incorrect because, while it sets the timeline for planning, it does not directly drive revenue or expense calculations-it’s a temporal parameter, not an assumption affecting financial data.
* D. Program mappings: This is incorrect because program mappings relate to integrating data across programs, not driving revenue or expense calculations within Projects.
* F. Discount rates: This is incorrect because discount rates are used for net present value (NPV) or financial analysis, not as a direct driver of revenue and expense assumptions in Projects.
The Oracle Projects module documentation highlights that Working days and hours, Standard rates, and Project rates are foundational assumptions that calculate costs (e.g., labor expenses) and revenues (e.g., billable amounts), making them the correct choices.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Configuring Projects Assumptions” (docs.oracle.
com, Published 2024-10-10).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Revenue and Expense Planning in Projects” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-11-25, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024, pushing data between cubes (e.g., from one cube to another within the same application) can be accomplished using specific tools. The two methods that facilitate this are:
* A. Data Integration: Incorrect. Data Integration is used to import data from external sources (e.g., files, other systems) into Planning, not to push data between cubes within the same application.
* B. Data Maps: Correct. Data Maps allow you to define mappings and push data between cubes (or applications) using Smart Push or manual execution. This is a primary method for intra-application data movement.
* C. Copy Data: Correct. The Copy Data feature enables administrators to copy data from one cube to another within the same Planning application, specifying dimensions and members to transfer.
* D. Import Data: Incorrect. Import Data is designed to bring external data into a cube from a file, not to push data between existing cubes.
Both Data Maps (with Smart Push for real-time updates) and Copy Data (for batch-style transfers) are explicitly supported for moving data between cubes, as per Oracle’s documentation, making B and C the correct answers.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Moving Data Between Cubes” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-09-05).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Data Maps and Copy Data Features” (docs.oracle.com, Published
2023-12-25, updated for 2024).

To include asset-related expenses such as depreciation, amortization, and insurance in Financials reporting within Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, integration between the Capital and Financials modules is required. The correct setup involves enabling integration from the Capital module to share expense data with Financials.
* A. In Capital, for Expense, enable Integration with Financials: This option activates the integration feature in the Capital module under the Expense section, allowing asset-related expenses (e.g., depreciation, amortization, insurance) to be automatically pushed to Financials. Once enabled, Capital maps these expenses to the appropriate Financials accounts, ensuring seamless reporting. This is the standard method outlined in Oracle documentation for sharing Capital data with Financials.
* B. In Financials, on the Enable page, in Map/Rename Dimensions, add a custom dimension called Assets: Adding a custom dimension in Financials is not the correct approach for integrating Capital expenses. Custom dimensions are for extending dimensionality, not for enabling data sharing between modules.
* C. In Capital, on the Configure page, select Map Capital Accounts and map capital accounts to the corresponding account in Financials: While account mapping is part of the integration process, it is a subsequent step that occurs after enabling integration. The primary action is enabling the integration itself, not just mapping accounts.
* D. In Financials, in the Asset Expenses Wizard, map each component to a Financials account:
There is no “Asset Expenses Wizard” in Financials for this purpose. The integration is driven from Capital, not through a wizard in Financials.
References
* Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: “Administering Capital – Integration with Financials” (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Specifies that “enabling Integration with Financials under Expenses in Capital” is required to share depreciation, amortization, and insurance expenses.
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Notes that enabling integration from Capital’s Expense section is the key step for including asset-related expenses in Financials reporting.

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, form validation rules ensure data integrity and usability by defining how forms are validated when loaded or saved. The platform supports multiple validation options tailored to performance, security, and user access, as outlined below:
* A. Validate only for cells and pages to which a user has access: This option restricts validation to the data cells and form pages that the logged-in user has permission to view or edit, based on security settings. It enhances performance by limiting the validation scope and ensures users only interact with relevant data.
* C. Validate for all page combinations and all existing or potential blocks: This comprehensive validation option checks all possible page combinations and data blocks (both existing and potential) within the form. It is useful for ensuring complete data consistency across the application, though it may impact performance due to its extensive scope.
* E. Validate only for pages with existing blocks: This option limits validation to pages that already contain data blocks, ignoring potential blocks that could be created. It strikes a balance between performance and thoroughness, focusing validation efforts on existing data.
* B. Validate rules as Service Administrator, regardless of logged-in user, when the form is loaded or saved: While Service Administrators have elevated privileges, this is not a distinct form validation rule option. Validation rules are applied based on form settings and user access, not specifically tied to the Service Administrator role overriding the logged-in user’s context.
* D. Validate only for users with access to this form: This option overlaps withAbut is less precise.
Validation is tied to cell-level and page-level access rather than a broad “users with access to this form” criterion, makingAthe more accurate choice per Oracle’s terminology.
References
* Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: “Designing Forms – Validation Rules” (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). Describes validation options including “cells and pages a user has access to,” “all page combinations and blocks,” and “pages with existing blocks.”
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Lists the three supported validation options (A, C, E) under form design and validation settings, aligning with security and performance optimization features.

In Oracle Planning 2024, predefined roles in Cloud EPM determine user permissions. The requirement is for a role that allows a Planning user to create and administer Planning or Planning Modules and service components, as well as grant permissions to other users. Among the options:
* A. System Administrator: Incorrect. This role exists in some Oracle systems but is not a Cloud EPM predefined role specific to Planning. It’s too broad and not aligned with EPM terminology.
* B. Approvals Administrator: Incorrect. This role manages approval processes (e.g., workflows) but does not include creating/administering applications or granting permissions beyond approvals.
* C. Identity Role Administrator: Incorrect. While this role manages identity and access (e.g., assigning roles), it does not allow creating or administering Planning applications or service components.
* D. Service Administrator: Correct. The Service Administrator role in Cloud EPM allows users to create and manage Planning applications, configure modules and service components (e.g., forms, rules), and assign permissions to other users via access control.
The Service Administrator role is the highest-level predefined role in Oracle EPM Cloud for Planning, encompassing application management and user permission assignments, making it the correct choice.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Predefined Roles in Cloud EPM” (docs.oracle.
com, Published 2024-08-25).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Managing Users and Roles” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-10-
30, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024, Smart Push is a feature within data maps that enables efficient, real-time data movement between Oracle EPM Cloud applications or instances. It copies data dynamically when triggered (e.
g., via forms or rules). The three supported ways to create data maps with Smart Push are:
* A. From Planning to Tax Reporting Cloud: Incorrect. Smart Push does not support direct data movement from Planning to Tax Reporting Cloud, as these modules lack a predefined integration path for this feature.
* B. From Tax Reporting Cloud to Planning: Incorrect. Similarly, Smart Push does not facilitate data movement from Tax Reporting Cloud to Planning.
* C. From Financial Consolidation and Close to Planning: Correct. Smart Push supports moving consolidated data (e.g., actuals) from Financial Consolidation and Close (FCC) to Planning for planning purposes.
* D. From Planning to Financial Consolidation and Close: Correct. Smart Push allows pushing planned data from Planning to FCC for consolidation or reporting.
* E. Between two Planning instances: Correct. Smart Push can move data between two Planning instances (e.g., test and production environments) to synchronize data.
These three options-C, D, and E-are explicitly supported by Smart Push in Oracle EPM Cloud, as per the documentation, enabling seamless data integration across these applications.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Using Smart Push in Data Maps” (docs.oracle.
com, Published 2024-09-30).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Data Integration with Smart Push” (docs.oracle.com, Published
2023-12-20, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024, Navigation Flows can be customized to tailor the user interface and experience based on specific categories. The three customization categories supported are Role, Group, and Global:
* A. Role: Navigation Flows can be customized for specific user roles (e.g., Planner, Administrator), allowing different layouts or access to cards based on job functions.
* C. Group: Customization can be applied to user groups, enabling administrators to assign tailored navigation flows to predefined sets of users based on their team or department.
* E. Global: Global customization applies to all users across the application, serving as the default navigation flow unless overridden by Role or Group settings.
* B. User: This is incorrect because Oracle Planning does not support navigation flow customization at the individual user level-customizations are broader, targeting roles or groups.
* D. Artifact: This is incorrect because “Artifact” refers to application components (e.g., forms, rules) managed in migration, not a category for navigation flow customization.
The Oracle documentation confirms that Role, Group, and Global are the three levels at which navigation flows can be customized, providing flexibility in how users interact with the Planning application.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Customizing Navigation Flows” (docs.oracle.
com, Published 2024-08-30).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Navigation Flow Administration” (docs.oracle.com, Published
2023-12-05, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation, business rules are essential for automating calculations, data manipulations, and complex logic within the application. The platform provides multiple features to assist users in creating these rules efficiently, as outlined in the Oracle documentation. The two features that directly help users create business rules are:
* A. Add calculations by using preformed system templates, such as clearing data, copying data, aggregating data, and so on: Oracle Planning offers predefined system templates that simplify rule creation. These templates enable users to quickly implement common operations like clearing data, copying data between dimensions, or aggregating data without writing complex code from scratch. This feature is particularly useful for users who may not have advanced scripting skills, as it provides a guided, template-driven approach to rule design.
* C. Design sophisticated rules that solve use cases that normal business rules cannot solve by using Groovy business rules: Groovy business rules extend the capabilities of standard business rules by allowing users to write custom logic using the Groovy scripting language. This feature is designed for advanced use cases, such as dynamic calculations based on runtime conditions or complex data manipulations that go beyond the scope of traditional rules. It empowers users to address specialized business requirements efficiently.
* B. Add calculations in calculation script syntax by switching to Script Mode: While Script Mode exists and allows users to write calculations using a script-based syntax (e.g., Essbase calc scripts), it is not highlighted as a primary “feature” for creating business rules in the Oracle Planning 2024 context. It is more of a mode of operation rather than a distinct feature assisting rule creation.
* D. Rules are represented graphically in a flow chart into which you can drag and drop components to design the rule: Although graphical rule design was a feature in older Hyperion Planning versions (e.g., Calculation Manager’s graphical interface), Oracle Planning 2024 documentation does not emphasize a drag-and-drop flowchart interface as a current primary method for rule creation. Instead, it focuses on templates and Groovy scripting.
References
* Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud Documentation: “Working with Business Rules” (docs.oracle.com, updated 2024). This section details the use of “system templates for calculations” and
“Groovy business rules” as key features for rule creation.
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: Confirms that predefined templates (e.g., for clearing or aggregating data) and Groovy rules are core features to assist users in designing business rules.

In Oracle Planning 2024, Groovy Rules enhance business logic flexibility. Oracle supports two main types of Groovy Rules:
* A. Rules that overwrite member formulas that combine operators and calculation functions, and perform calculations on members in Dimension Editor: Incorrect. Groovy Rules do not overwrite member formulas in the Dimension Editor; they operate at runtime and are defined in the Rules editor, not as static dimension overrides.
* B. Rules that can dynamically generate calculation scripts at run time based on contexts such as runtime prompts, the POV, the current grid, and so on: Correct. Oracle supports Groovy Rules that generate dynamic calc scripts based on runtime contexts (e.g., POV, grid data, prompts), enabling adaptive calculations.
* C. Pure Groovy rules that can perform data validations and cancel the operation if the data entered violates company policies: Correct. Pure Groovy Rules can validate data (e.g., checking ranges or policies) and cancel operations (e.g., via exceptions), a key feature for enforcing business rules.
* D. Rules that dynamically calculate data and perform validation checks in tile charts and infolets:
Incorrect. Groovy Rules operate on cubes and forms, not directly within tile charts or infolets, which are UI elements driven by underlying data, not rule execution points.
The Oracle documentation confirms B (dynamic script generation) and C (data validation) as supported Groovy Rule types, making them the correct answers.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Groovy Rules in Planning” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-10-15).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Supported Groovy Rule Types” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-
11-20, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024, Service Administrators can use the Clone Snapshot feature to create an exact copy of the current application in a target environment. This feature automates all actions required for cloning, including removing the existing application and data in the target environment (if any) and replacing it with a snapshot of the source environment. The process involves exporting a snapshot fromthe source, deleting the target environment’s current application and data, and then importing and applying the snapshot to recreate the application identically.
* A. Replicate Snapshot: This is incorrect because “Replicate Snapshot” is not a defined feature in Oracle Planning. Replication typically implies duplicating data without necessarily overwriting the target, which doesn’t align with the requirement of removing existing content.
* B. Migration Export: This is incorrect because Migration Export only exports application artifacts (e.g., metadata, data) to a file for manual transfer or backup, but it does not automate the removal of the target environment’s content or the import process.
* C. Clone Snapshot: This is correct. The Clone Snapshot feature, available under the Environment management tools, fully automates the cloning process, including deletion of the target environment’s application and data, followed by the recreation of the source application.
* D. Migration Backup: This is incorrect because Migration Backup creates a backup file for recovery purposes but does not involve cloning or overwriting a target environment.
The Oracle Planning 2024 documentation specifies that Clone Snapshot is designed for such end-to-end automation, making it the ideal choice for Service Administrators to replicate an application across environments efficiently.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Managing Environments with Clone Snapshot” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-09-15).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Cloning Environments in Planning” (docs.oracle.com, Published
2023-10-20, updated for 2024).

To set up weekly planning for 18 continuous months in Oracle Planning 2024’s Financials module, specific options must be selected when initially enabling features via the Configure card. The three required options are:
* A. Time Frame Granularity: Incorrect. This is not a specific option in the Enable Features page; granularity (e.g., weeks) is controlled by Weekly Planning, not a separate setting.
* B. Rolling Forecast: Correct. Enabling Rolling Forecast allows planning over a continuous 18-month horizon, dynamically updating as time progresses, which aligns with the requirement for ongoing weekly planning.
* C. Weeks to Months Mapping: Correct. This option defines how weekly data rolls up into monthly totals, essential for reporting and analysis over the 18-month period in a weekly planning setup.
* D. Weekly Planning: Correct. Enabling Weekly Planning sets the periodicity to weeks instead of months, allowing budgeting and forecasting at a weekly level for the 18 months.
* E. Custom Periods: Incorrect. Custom Periods allow defining non-standard time periods, but they are not required for weekly planning over 18 months-Weekly Planning and standard calendar setups suffice.
The Oracle documentation confirms that Rolling Forecast, Weeks to Months Mapping, and Weekly Planning are the key features to enable for weekly planning over an extended horizon like 18 months, making B, C, and D the correct answers.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Enabling Weekly Planning in Financials” (docs.
oracle.com, Published 2024-09-10).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Configuring Rolling Forecasts and Weekly Planning” (docs.oracle.
com, Published 2023-11-20, updated for 2024).

In Oracle Planning 2024, the approval process uses an approval unit hierarchy where parent and child relationships influence the review workflow. The two ways these relationships affect the process are:
* A. When the status of all children changes to one status (for example, Signed Off), the parent status changes to the same status: Correct. In a bottom-up approval process, when all child approval units reach a uniform status (e.g., Signed Off, Approved), the parent’s status automatically updates to match, reflecting the completion of the children’s review.
* B. When you approve a parent, its children are Signed Off: Incorrect. Approving a parent does not automatically sign off its children; the workflow typically moves bottom-up, requiring children to be approved first.
* C. After all children are promoted to the same owner, the parent status is changed to Signed Off:
Incorrect. Promotion to an owner changes ownership, not necessarily status (e.g., Signed Off). Status changes are driven by approval actions, not just ownership.
* D. After all children are promoted to the same owner, the parent is promoted to the owner: Correct. In the approval hierarchy, once all child units are promoted to a new owner (e.g., for review), the parent unit is also promoted to that owner, ensuring the hierarchy progresses together.
The Oracle documentation confirms that A (status aggregation) and D (owner promotion) are key behaviors of parent/child relationships in the approval process, making them the correct answers.
References:
* Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation Study Guide: “Approval Unit Hierarchies” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2024-09-25).
* Oracle EPM Cloud Documentation: “Managing Approvals” (docs.oracle.com, Published 2023-12-20, updated for 2024).